Ann Coulter Is Not Even Remotely Attractive

October 17, 2007 in Faisca, Pop Culture

Like all men, part of my “is a woman attractive” schema is based on the hypothetical question of whether or not I’d ever have sex with the woman in question.

There are other attributes as well, like whether or not I’d enjoy her company, if she has a nice personality, if she is a generally pleasant human being, etc. Ann Coulter fits none of the above, but today we’re only going to focus on the looks part of the deal anway.

That being said, the one and only way I’d ever have sex with Ann Coulter is if my only alternative was Condoleeza Rice or Hillary Clinton and there was a gun pointed at my head.

Catch my drift?

Now, someone might say, “Well, Faisca, for a 46 year old woman, Ann Coulter is hot for an old lady.” That person, my friends, would invariably be wrong.

The fact that Ann Coulter is in fact a man masquerading as a woman not withstanding, she is not remotely attractive.

I mean, what could do it for you? The deep baritone of her voice? The extremely weird looking mouth and way of talking? The general “birdishness” of her look and demeanor? Perhaps the contours of the skeleton from which her skin hangs (like sleeve of wizard?)? Or maybe it’s the Adam’s Apple?

Before you go off and crucify me and say that I’m being prejudiced against older women, let it be known that there are plenty of women in Ann Coulter’s age bracket who are, in fact, “hot for an old lady.”

Pamela Anderson (40), Cindy Crawford (41), Elizabeth Hurley (42), Monica Belluci (43), Demi Moore (45), Meg Ryan (46), Michelle Pfeiffer (49), Madonna (49), Katie Couric (50).

See? They’re all attractive. Ann Coulter is not.

So, in conclusion:

Hot

Not

---

Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)

• The Bird and the Mom Are Politically ProActive
• Ann Who?
• Yet Another Reason Not to Vote for Hillary